Writ petitions filed against the State of Karnataka invoking Article 226 and 227. The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, dismissed the petitions on the submission that they had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 08th DAY OF JUNE 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION Nos.102694-696/2018 (GM-PDS)
BETWEEN:
...Petitioners
(By SMT.SUNITHA P KALASOOR, ADV.[through V.C.])
AND
2
CONSUMER AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OFFICE AT: CONGLIAON ROAD, BENGALURU.
….Respondents
(By Sri.SHIVAPRABHU S HIREMATH, AGA FOR R1 TO R6)
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 1) CALL FOR RECORDS OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF ISSUANCE OF ANNEXURE-"C" AT NO.FCS 14 KPR 2015 DATED:22.09.2016 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 AND ETC.,
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners appearing through
video conference submitted that the above writ petitions have become infructuous.
3
petitioners is taken on record.
become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Kgk
J. Dodda Basappa
Obalesh
Shantabai
The State of Karnataka
Commissioner, Food and Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs
H.T. Narendra Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
