Dismissed

Sri H R Ramesh v. M/S Janapada Seva Trust

Karnataka HC18 Jan 2021WA/648/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed a writ appeal filed solely because the appellant's counsel requested withdrawal. The order noted the appellant invoked the ratio from a previous judgment to claim the writ appeal was not maintainable. No substantive legal question was decided on merits.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ appeal; certified copies returned to appellant's counsel.

Sri H R Ramesh Vs M/S Janapada Seva Trust — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G.UMA

¶8

WRIT APPEAL NO.648 OF 2020 (GM-CPC)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI.H.R.RAMESH SON OF LATE.SRI.H.S.RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS NO.27, 14^TH BLOCK, SBM COLONY SRIRAMPURA, 2^ND STAGE MYSURU-570 034.

¶11

... APPELLANT

¶12

(BY SRI:MOHAN S., ADVOCATE (VC))

¶13

AND:

¶14

M/S JANAPADA SEVA TRUST MELUKOTE PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 431. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

¶15

SANTHOSH KOULAGI.

¶16

SRI.PRAKASH IYER

¶17

SON OF SRI.K.SHANKARANARAYAN AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.34, EAGLE RITZ 16 K.M.BEGUR KOPPA ROAD BENGALURU-560 068. ... RESPONDENTS

¶18

¶19

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 10.03.2020 PASSED IN W.P.NO.4945 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU, CONSEQUENTLY TO ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION FILED IN WP NO.4945 OF 2020, ON THE FILE OF THIS HON’BLE COURT.

¶20

THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

J U D G M E N T

¶22

Office has raised an objection with regard to the maintainability of the writ appeal in view of the judgment reported in ILR 2009 KAR 1207 ( Tammanna and Others

¶23

Vs Miss.Renuka and Others) .

¶24

We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant.

¶25

Appellant’s counsel submits that in view of the

¶26

ratio laid down in the said judgment, the writ appeal is not maintainable. Hence, permission may be granted to withdraw the writ appeal.

¶27

Submission of Sri.S.Mohan, the learned counsel

¶28

is placed on record.

¶29

¶30

5. Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶31

Consequently, certified copy of the impugned order

¶32

and all other certified copies of the documents are permitted to be returned to the appellant’s counsel subject to filing of copies of the same for the purpose of record.

¶33

Liberty is granted to the appellant to seek

¶34

appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

¶35

Sd/JUDGE

¶36

Sd/JUDGE

¶37

*bgn/-

Sri H R Ramesh v. M/S Janapada Seva Trust

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri H R Ramesh v. M/S Janapada Seva Trust

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Megashree G N Vs Harshath S

Sri. a. C. Manohar Vs Smt. S. Latha

Sri D Nagarjuna Vs Sri B Gurumurthy

Sri Uday Kumar C Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Ningappa P. Pujari Vs the State of Karnataka

K.L.Ranjitha Vs the State of Karnataka