The writ appeal became infructuous as the respondent had vacated the premises in question. The High Court disposed of the appeal and all pending interlocutory applications accordingly.
The appeal and all pending interlocutory applications were disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA WRIT APPEAL NO. 360/2019 (EDN-RES)
BETWEEN:
.... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. LAXMINARAYAN, AGA)
AND:
GYAAN TARA CHARITABLE TRUST NO.711/35, 1ST ‘C’ MAIN 8TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU-560 082 REP. BY ITS TRUSTEE TARA R. JAIN, W/O RAKESH P. JAIN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS (BY SRI.S.BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE)
... RESPONDENT
2
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC. 4 OF THE KARNATKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 2/8/2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP 32052/2018 (EDN-RES) AND ETC.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has informed this Court that the premises in question has been vacated by the sole respondent, which renders the appeal infructuous.
In view of the above submission, the appeal stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
In view of disposal of the appeal, all the pending Interlocutory Applications do not survive for consideration. Accordingly, all the pending applications stand disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
KGR*
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Karnataka Department of Education
The Block Education Officer
Gyaan Tara Charitable Trust
Satish Chandra Sharma
V. Srishananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
