High Court listed a writ appeal for hearing on 10.06.2026. The court addressed pending interlocutory applications regarding document production and removed objections to an application filed by appellants, directing their removal within 24 hours.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WA NO. 3324/2016 (LA - BDA)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
[BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER VS. NATIONAL TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTIONS AND ANOTHER]
23.04.2026 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
On record is a memo dated 27.01.2026 for production of
Digitally signed by KAVYA G Location: High Court of Karnataka
documents filed by the advocate for respondent No.1. I.A No.1/2025 for production of additional documents filed by respondent No.1. I.A No.9/2017 for production of additional documents filed by advocate for the appellants. The said memo / I.As shall be considered with regard to their admissibility and otherwise at the time of hearing of this writ appeal. As such, the office objections are dealt with. As far as the office objection raised on I.A. No.2/2025 filed by the appellants, the office objections shall be removed within 24 hours.
List this matter on 10.06.2026.
If any translations of documents are required to be filed,
the same shall be filed no later than 02.06.2026, failing which, the documents shall not be considered by the Court at the time
of hearing.
(JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
KG
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER
NATIONAL TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTIONS AND ANOTHER
JAYANT BANERJI
RAJESH RAI K
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
