The High Court of Karnataka disposed of writ appeal no.2038 of 2014 filed by the Bangalore Development Authority against an order in a land acquisition matter. The appeal was settled by companies that parties arrived at during the proceedings.
Writ appeal disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
WRIT APPEAL NO.2038 OF 2014 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN :
(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND :
….RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION 2211 OF 2013 DATED 11.07.2014.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sriyuths D.N.Nanjunda Reddy, learned senior counsel for G.Lakshmeesh Rao, learned counsel for the appellants, Shiva Kumar H, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2, Jeevan J Neeralagi, learned AGA for respondent No.3.
the parties, it is not necessary for us to adjudicate the
validity of the order passed by the learned Single
Judge, impugned in this writ appeal.
Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
rs
Bangalore Development Authority
Renukiah
R. Rajashekaraiah
State of Karnataka
Alok Aradhe
Ashok S. Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
