Appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC was dismissed for default due to non-payment of costs as per an order dated 07.01.2021.
Dismissed for default of non-payment of costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.SUDHINDRARAO
R.S.A.No.952/2010
BETWEEN:
1 . K SURESHA S/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
2 . SHARADAMMA W/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
BOTH ARE AGRICULTURIST R/O VISHWANATHANAHALLI B -DURGA HOBLI HOLALKERE TALUK – 577 526.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI R SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE – ABSENT)
AND:
1 . THIMMAVVA @ THIMMAMMA W/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O VISHWANATHANAHALLI B- DURGA HOBLI, HOLALKERE TALUK – 577 526.
2 . KOLLAPPA
2
S/O LATE RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O VISHWANATHANAHALLI B- DURGA HOBLI, HOLALKERE TALUK – 577 526.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K SHASHIKANTH PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R1- ABSENT, R2- SERVED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:05.01.2010 PASSED IN R.A.No.77/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION), HOLALKERE, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:27.09.2005 PASSED IN O.S.No.124/2003 ON THE FFILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN), HOLALKERE.
THIS RSA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Cost not paid. In view of order dated
07.01.2021, appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SBN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K SURESHA
SHARADAMMA
THIMMAVVA
KOLLAPPA
N.K.SUDHINDRARAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
