The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a Section 100 CPC appeal filed against a lower court decree, recording that the parties had arrived at a settlement via memo.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn after recording that parties reached a settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
R.S.A.NO.883/2020 (MON)
BETWEEN:
H.N.SHASHIKUMAR S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT 9TH CROSS, HALLAHALLI NEAR KALUVE, MANDYA CITY.
… APPELLANT
[BY SRI CHANDRASHEKAR H.B., ADVOCATE]
AND:
M.E.SHANKARA S/O EREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT HALLAHALLI BADAVANE KALUVE ROAD, MANDYA CITY.
… RESPONDENT
THIS R.S.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.11.2019 PASSED IN R.A.NO.50/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL, CONFIRMING AND MODIFYING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.03.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.148/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MANDYA.
THIS R.S.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the parties have arrived at the settlement in Ex.P.No.641/2020 pending on the file of Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) at Mandya and the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn in view of the settlement.
The memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
ST
H.N. Shashikumar
M.E. Shankara
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
