Smt Sarala v. Smt Vimala Ramachandra
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular Second Appeal regular call. One week time granted to comply with office objections. Court noted subsequent non-compliance and disposed of the appeal by dismissal via note.
Regular Second Appeal regular call. One week time granted to comply with office objections. Court noted subsequent non-compliance and disposed of the appeal by dismissal via note.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 645 OF 2014
BETWEEN
SMT SARALA
D/O LATE DURGA,
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/AT LAKKANNA POOJARY COMPOUND,
NEAR PVS KALAKUNJA, MANGALURU-575003
... APPELLANT/S
(By Sri/Smt:B.V.VIDYULATHA & RAJAYOGA K, ADVOCATES)
AND
CHIRAG, VALANCIA,
…2
2
RSA NO. 645/2014
GORIGUDDA
MANGALURU-575002
W/O LATE THIMMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS, R/AT NEAR SULTAN BATTHERI BOLOOR, MANGALURU-575002
SMT.VINODA (SINCE DEAD) D/O LATE DURGA,
…3
3
RSA NO. 645/2014
SMT.GEETHA GIRIYAPPA BANGERA (SINCE DEAD) D/O LATE DURGA
…4
RSA NO. 645/2014
4
| 9. | SRI.GIRIYAPPA POOVA BANGERA, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, |
|---|---|
| 10. | SRI.CHETHAN GIRIYAPPA BANGERA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, |
| 11. | SRI.NITHIN GIRIYAPPA BANGERA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, |
| 12. | SRI.PRAVEEN GIRIYAPPA BANGERA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, |
| RESPONDENT NOS.9-12 ARE ALL R/AT NO.1-B-64, RUSTUM JEE REGENCY, JAYAWANTH SAWANTH ROAD, DAHISAR WEST, MUMBAI-400068 |
|
| 13. | SMT.NEELA KIRAN W/O HEMA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, DAUGHTER-IN-LAW OF LATE DURGA, R/AT NO.128, 3RDBLOCK EAST, 4THMAIN, NEAR TEJAWINI GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL , JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560011 …5 |
RSA NO. 645/2014
5
D/O HEMA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, DAUGHTER-IN-LAW OF LATE DURGA, R/AT NO.128, 3RD BLOCK EAST 4TH MAIN, NEAR TEJAWINI GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL, JAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 011
15. MISS.ISHITHA
D/O HEMA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, DAUGHTER-IN-LAW OF LATE DURGA, R/AT NO.128, 3RD BLOCK EAST, 4TH MAIN, NEW TEJASWINI GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL, JAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560011
S/O LATE DURGA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT 1ST FLOOR, ARIHANTH APARTMENT, PINTOS LANE,
MANGALURU-575001.
…6
6
RSA NO. 645/2014
18. SRI.SUSHEEL
S/O LATE RAGHAVA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
RESPONDENT NOS. 17 & 18 ARE R/AT NO.30, MANOHAR MAHAL, MOGHAL LANE, NEAR TENDULAR HALL, MAHI MUMBAI-400016
19. SMT.RENUKA HARISH KUMAR
S/O LATE RAGHAVA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.33, CITADEL, BLOCK 154, RDP 7, SECTOR-3, CHORKOP KANDIVILLI WEST, MUMBAI-400067
…7
RSA NO. 645/2014
7
S/O LATE K.SANJEEVA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT 563, CHARISHMA, 3RD BLOCK, 6TH MAIN, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034
…8
8
RSA NO. 645/2014
JAYANAGAR (EAST) BENGALURU-560011
25. SMT.INDIRA
D/O LATE LAKKANNA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, R/AT LAKKANNA POOJARY COMPOUND, NEAR PVS KALAKUNJA, KODIALBAIL, MANGALURU-575003
SMT.MANORANJINI NAGENDRA (SINCE DEAD) D/O LATE LAKKANNA
S/O LATE K.SHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
DEFENDANT NOS.26 TO 28 ARE RESIDING AT RATHAN DEEP,
…9
9
RSA NO. 645/2014
NO.3, KRISHNA COLONY, NEAR SWATHY SOCIETY NANJEEVA AHMEDABAD,
GUJARATH-380014
…RESPONDENT/S
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.11.2013 PASSED IN RA NO.70/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, D.K, MANGALURU DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.04.2009 PASSED IN OS NO.4/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.), MANGALURU, D.K.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:-
ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellant is present.
One week time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Sd/- JUDGE
…10
10
RSA NO. 645/2014
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 27.08.2021, office objections are not complied with, hence appeal shall stand dismissed.
COPY
Sd/I/c ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By: SV R By: PH C By: CS Ty Date: 11.02.2022 C Date: 11.02.2022
SMT SARALA
SMT VIMALA RAMACHANDRA
SMT.SONYA DEEPIKA
SRI.SHAHEEN SUVARNA
SMT.KOKILA SOOTHANU
SMT.SUSHEELA
E.S.INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court