A regular second appeal against a judgment confirming a prior decree. The High Court granted three weeks to comply with office objections and subsequently dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution when the objections were not complied with.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 567 OF 2019
BETWEEN
S/O LATE SYED CHOTE SAB AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
S/O LATE SYED CHOTE SAB AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
S/O LATE SYED CHOTE SAB
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
S/O LATE SYED CHOTE SAB AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT KONDARAJANAHALLI
…2
2
RSA NO.567/2019
KASABA HOBLI,
KOLAR TALUK
... APPELLANT/S
(By Sri: V ANANDA AND H VASANTH KUMAR ADVOCATES)
AND
SINCE DEAD REP BY LR
S/O LATE SYED SABJAN SAB R/AT 3RD CROSS SYED NAGAR KOLAR
W/O LATE SYED AKBAR
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
d) AREEF PASHA S/O LATE SYED AKBAR AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS R-1 TO R-4 R/AT #1738 3RD CROSS, SHAHID NAGAR KOLAR
…3
3
RSA NO.567/2019
S/O LATE SYED SABJAN SAB AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT II CROSS POOLSHA MOHALLA, KOLAR TOWN
S/O LATE SYED AHAMED AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT DARGA MOHALLA KOLAR TOWN
…RESPONDENT/S
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100
AND ORDER XLII RULE 2 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.12.2015 PASSED IN RA NO.153/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AT KOLAR. DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.06.2012 IN OS NO.214/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AT KOLAR.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:-
…4
RSA NO.567/2019
4
ORDER
Finally, three weeks time is granted to comply with the
office objections, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed
for non prosecution without reference to the bench.
Sd/-
JUDGE
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 27.09.2021, office objections
are not complied with, hence appeal shall stand dismissed.
COPY
Sd/I/C ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By: SV R By: HKV C By: PH
Ty Date: 12.09.2022 C Date: 13.09.2022
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SYED MOULA
SYED MOULA
SYED ZAMEER
REEHAN PASHA
IRFAN PASHA
NAYAZ PASHA
E.S.INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
