Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Sri Kannan Vs B H Ramesh — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2021)

Home
Karnataka HC
2021
Sri Kannan Vs B H RameshSri Kannan v. B H Ramesh

Dismissed

Sri Kannan v. B H Ramesh

Karnataka HC8 Sept 2021RSA/499/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Karnataka High Court dismissed a Regular Second Appeal for non-compliance with office objections within the granted timeframe.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed for failure to comply with office objections within two weeks.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021 BEFORE

THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.499 OF 2019

BETWEEN

SRI KANNAN

S/O RANGAN

AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS

RESIDING AT KAIMARA

POST-577 131

THARIKERE ROAD CHIKKAMAGALURU

…APPELLANT/S

(Sri/Smt: SRINANDAN K AND ANISHACHARYA ADVOCATES)

AND

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
SRI KANNAN
respondent
B H RAMESH
respondent
SMT PUTTALAXMI
respondent
SMT PRAVEENA
respondent
SMT SUNEETHA
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 8 Sept 2021 · September
Registered: 8 Mar 2019
Case no.: RSA/499/2019

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from E.s.indiresh

Smt Jayamma Vs Sri Venkatarama Bhovi
7 Sept 2021
B R Basanth Kumar Vs M.B.P.Kamakshi
7 Sept 2021
Sri Mohammed Aslam Pasha Vs Sri Mohammed Rasool @ Babu
7 Sept 2021
Sri M S Lingaprabhu Vs Sri Siddappa
8 Sept 2021

Cite this judgement

Sri Kannan v. B H Ramesh, RSA/499/2019 (KA), decided on 8 September 2021.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

E.S.INDIRESH

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Appeal dismissed for failure to comply with office objections within two weeks.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The Regular Second Appeal (No. 499 of 2019) was listed before the High Court of Karnataka. The Court granted two weeks to comply with office objections. Since the appellant failed to comply, the appeal was dismissed without being referred to the Bench.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

B H RAMESH

S/O HANUMANTHEGOWDA

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS

RESIDING AT KALLEAVARAPURA

VILLAGE

KAIMARA POST

CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK

PUTTASWAMY

SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS

…2

2

RSA NO. 499/2019

SMT PUTTALAXMI

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

W/O LATE PUTTASWAMY

SMT PRAVEENA

AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS D/O LATE PUTTASWAMY

SMT SUNEETHA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS D/O LATE PUTTASWAMY

SRI KIRAN AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS S/O LATE PUTTASWAMY

RESPONDENT NOS. 2 TO 5 RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE KAIMARA POST, KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU

6. SMT ARAI

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS W/O LATE ANNAMALAI

SRI KUMAR AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS S/O LATE ANNAMALAI

…3

3

RSA NO. 499/2019

RESPONDENT NOS. 6 TO 7, RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE KAIMARA POST, KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK

SMT CHELUVI

AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS W/O SHANMUGAM DASARAHALLI BILL COLLECTOR ADARSHANAGAR CHIKKAMAGALURU

….RESPONDENT/S

(Sri/Smt: B.C.Jagadeesh, Advocate for C/R1)

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.12.2018 PASSED IN RA NO.112/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM., CHIKKAMAGALURU ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.09.2017 PASSED IN OS NO.181/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE 2^ND ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHIKKAMAGALURU.

This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:-

…4

RSA NO. 499/2019

4

ORDER

Two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench.

Sd/-

JUDGE

NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 08.09.2021, office objections

are not complied with, hence appeal shall stand dismissed.

COPY

Sd/I/C ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

T By: PH R By: HKV C By: DS

Ty Date: 22.08.2022 C Date: 23.08.2022

SRI KIRAN

Coram

AI extract

E.S.INDIRESH

CNR

KAHC010074242019

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

Smt v. B. Lalitha Vs v. B. Muddamma

8 Sept 2021

B C Ramalingaiah Vs L Jayaramu

8 Sept 2021