Sri. Thimmegowda v. Sri Shivaramu
Case brief
What is this about?
In a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 r/w. Order XLII Rule 1 CPC, the High Court granted three weeks to comply with office objections, threatening dismissal of the appeal without reference to the bench if not done.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021 BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 491 OF 2019
BETWEEN
SRI. THIMMEGOWDA S/O LATE HUTCHEGOWDA
50 YEARS,
ANKEGOWDANADODDI,
HAMLET OF ARUVANAHALLI C A KERE HOBLI MADDUR TALUK-571 428
MANDYA DISTRICT
... APPELLANT/S
(By Sri.: M V RAMESH JAISH AND NAVEEN PATIL,ADVOCATES)
AND
SRI SHIVARAMU
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SRI THIMMEGOWDA
- respondent
SRI SHIVARAMU
Coram
E.S.INDIRESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/491/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court