the First Appellate Court has come to the conclusion that the documents are not legible, then the First Appellate Court ought to have directed the parties to produce the typed copy, inter alia, sought to know the relevancy of those documents for adjudicating the appeal. In the instant case, looking into the findings recorded by the First Appellate Court at paragraph 29, and the finding recorded by the First Appellate Court at paragraph 37 of the judgment, the First Appellate Court has come to the conclusion that these documents cannot be a basis for adjudicating the appeal. In that view of the matter, I am of the considered view that the First Appellate Court ought to have made an endeavour to consider the relevance of these documents to adjudicate the appeal and thereafter come to a conclusion that those documents are necessary/require for adjudication of the appeal. Therefore, the reasons assigned by the First Appellate Court is contrary to law, particularly not reappreciating the material on record as required Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure as well as the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of G. SARASWATHI AND ANOTHER v. RATHINAMMAL AND OTHERS reported in (2018)3 SCC 340, while dealing with provisions of Order XLI Rule 31 and Section 100 of
