Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

N.Shanthamma Vs Gundurao — Succession and Inheritance | Karnataka HC (2021)

Home
Karnataka HC
2021
N.Shanthamma Vs GunduraoN.Shanthamma v. Gundurao

Dismissed

N.Shanthamma v. Gundurao

Karnataka HC23 Apr 2021RSA/263/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular second appeal filed under S. 100 CPC was dismissed as not pressed, following an appellant's memo stating no opposition was sought.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as not pressed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF APRIL, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.263 OF 2015 (PAR)

BETWEEN:

N.SHANTHAMMA, W/O VASANTHAKUMAR, D/O SAVITHRAMMA AND NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, RESIDING AT GARADI BEEDI, NAGAMANGALA ROAD, PANDAVAPURA TOWN, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 434.

... APPELLANT

(BY SRI.M.R.MAMATHA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

GUNDURAO, S/O M NARAYANAPPA AND H. SAVITHRAMMA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, WORKING AS VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT TALUK OFFICE, PANDAVAPURA – 571 434.

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

CPC100

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
N.SHANTHAMMA
respondent
GUNDURAO
respondent
N. ANANTHARAMU
respondent
SHANTHAMMA
respondent
BALASUBRAMANYA
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 23 Apr 2021 · April
Registered: 11 Feb 2015
Case no.: RSA/263/2015

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R. Natara

Sri Ramakrishnappa S/O Late Kariyappa @ Kariyanna Vs Smt Rangamma W/O K. Thimmappa
22 Apr 2021
Sri Shivanna Vs v Swetha
21 Apr 2021
Sri Nanjappa Vs Sri Narasappa
21 Apr 2021
Smt Basamma Vs Siddalingappa
23 Apr 2021

Cite this judgement

N.Shanthamma v. Gundurao, RSA/263/2015 (KA), decided on 23 April 2021.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

CPC100

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

NATARAJ RANGASWAMY

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Appeal dismissed as not pressed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Order dismissing appeal on the ground that it was not pressed. When the appellant files a memo admitting no opposition, the appeal is disposed of without substantive adjudication.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

N. ANANTHARAMU, S/O M. NARAYANAPPA AND SAVITHRAMMA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, RESIDING AT BHOGADI, MYSORE CITY – 570 009.

2

SHANTHAMMA, W/O NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,

BALASUBRAMANYA, S/O N. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, BOTH R3 AND R4 ARE RESIDING AT D.NO.42/2, 4^TH MAIN ROAD, KAMAKSHIPALYA, BANGALORE – 560 070.

K. MAHESHA, S/O PADMAVATHI AND KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT NANJANGUDU – 571 301.

K. SUMA, D/O PADMAVATHI AND KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT NANJANGUDU – 571 301.

K. VIDYA, W/O N. DHANANJAYA, D/O K.KRISHNA, MAJOR, RESIDING AT HIREMARALI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 434.

N. RAJALAKSHMI, D/O SAVITHRAMMA AND NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT GARADI BEEDI, NAGAMANGALA ROAD,

3

PANDAVAPURA TOWN, MANDYA DISTRICT-571434..

… RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.V.N.MADHAVA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI.K.L.SREENIVAS, ADVOCATE FOR R7; R6 AND R8 ARE SERVED)

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.11.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.54/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE MANDYA (SITTING AT SRIRANGAPATNNA), DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.03.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.37/2010 THE FILE OF THE C.J.(SR.DN) JMFC., & MACT., AT PANDAVAPURA.

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

J U D G M E N T

A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, which is counter signed by the appellant stating that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed.

2. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed

as not pressed .

Sd/JUDGE

NR/-

K. MAHESHA

Coram

AI extract

NATARAJ RANGASWAMY

CNR

KAHC010168032015

Topic

Succession and Inheritance

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED

Smt Pushpa Vs Sumithra

23 Apr 2021

Srinivasa Vs Rathnamma

23 Apr 2021