Dismissed

Smt Thayimarakka v. Sri M Manjappa

Karnataka HC19 Aug 2021RSA/2530/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka granted time to comply with office objections; noting non-compliance in a subsequent note, this order records the dismissal of the regular second appeal without reference to the Bench. (Note: intended for content that is not substantive.

What did the court decide?

RULE MADE - THREE WEEKS GRANTED FOR OFFICE OBJECTIONS; NOTE RECORDS FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH OBLIGATIONS

Smt Thayimarakka Vs Sri M Manjappa — Service and Employment | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶2

DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2530 OF 2018

¶5

BETWEEN

¶6

SMT.THAYIMARAKKA

¶7

DAUGHTER OF M.NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

¶8

SMT.JAYALAKSHMAMMA DAUGHTER OF M.NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

¶9

SMT. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA DAUGHTER OF M.NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

¶10

SMT.PARVATHAMMA DAUGHTER OF M.NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

…2

RSA 2530/2018

ALL ARE RESIDING AT ATTIKUPPE VILLAGE, MARALAVADI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK

¶15

... APPELLANT/S

¶16

(By Sri. :K.S.SREEKANTHA, ADVOCATE)

¶17

AND

¶18

SRI.M.NANJAPPA

¶19

SON OF LATE.MUDDEGOWDA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS:

¶20

1(a) SMT.KEMPAMMA

¶21

WIFE OF LATE M.NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,

¶22

SRI.SHIVAKUMAR

¶23

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SON OF LATE.M.NANJAPPA

¶24

SRI.MUDDEGOWDA

¶25

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SON OF LATE.M.NANJAPPA

¶26

ALL ARE RESIDING AT ATTIKUPPE VILLAGE,

…3

RSA 2530/2018

MARALAVADI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK.

¶31

SMT.SUDHA MANOHAR DAUGHTER OF MANCHARAN NAIR, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT APARTMENT NO.B1, SHOBHA, TUQUOISE, SITE NO.17(OLD), NEW NO.3, HADDIN ROAD, CIVIL STATION, ULSOOR ROAD, BENGALURU-42

¶32

... RESPONDENT/S

¶33

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.11.2018 PASSED IN RA NO.5008/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA SIT AT KANAKAPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.07.2013 PASSED IN OS NO.429/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA.

…4

RSA 2530/2018

This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the

¶38

Court made the following Order.

¶39

ORDER

¶40

Three weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections,

¶41

failing which, the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench.

¶42

Sd/- JUDGE

¶43

NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 19.08.2021, office objections are not complied with, hence appeal shall be dismissed.

¶44

COPY

¶45

Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶46

T By : SV R By : PH C By : DS Ty Dt : 18.11.2021 C.Dt : 19.11.2021

Smt Thayimarakka v. Sri M Manjappa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Thayimarakka v. Sri M Manjappa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri J Jayarama Reddy Vs Sri Srirama Reddy

C N Nagappa Dead by Lrs Vs Giri

C. N. Gopala Krishna Vs Smt. Savithramma

Sri T v Venkataravanappa Vs Smt Marakka

Laksmhamma @ Lakshmi Vs Channegowda

Sri Venkataramaiah Vs Smt Sunanda @ N Sunanda