Prabhu v. Shivananjappa
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2021
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2522 OF 2018
BETWEEN
S/O LATE NANJAPPA @ PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
S/O LATE NANJAPPA @ PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
BOTH ARE R/AT HARACHANAAHALLY VILLAGE, HONNAVALLY HOBLI,
TIPTUR TALUK,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT -572217
... APPELLANT/S
(By Sri. :LAKSHMI KANTH K & PRATHAP KUMAR M.S, ADVOCATES)
AND
…2
RSA NO.2522/2018
2
W/O LATE SHIVANANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
1(b) SHIVAGANGAMMA D/O LATE SHIVANANJAPPA W/O JAYANNA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS NO.1(a) AND 1(b) ARE RESIDING AT HARACHANAHALLY VILLAGE HONNAVALLY, TIPTUR TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572217
1(c). KEMPADEVAMMA D/O LATE SHIVANANJAPPA W/O MAHALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT LINGADAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI TIPTUR TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572217
…3
RSA NO.2522/2018
3
RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE R/O HARACHANNAHALLY VILLAGE HONNAVALLY HOBLI,
TIPTUR TALUK
TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572217
... RESPONDENT/S
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.10.2018 PASSED IN RA NO.63/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIPTUR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.10.2010 PASSED IN OS NO.164/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE, TIPTUR AND C/C OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, TIPTUR.
This Regular Second Appeal is coming on for orders, this day the Court made the following Order.
…4
RSA NO.2522/2018
4
ORDER
Three weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing
which, the appeal stand dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Sd/- JUDGE
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 23.08.2021 office objection is not complied
with, hence appeal stand dismissed.
COPY
Sd/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By: VS R By : PH C By: DS
Ty Date: 19.01.2022 C Date: 20.01.2022
PRABHU
UMESH
SHIVANANJAPPA
PARVATHAMMA
SHIVAGANGAMMA
KEMPADEVAMMA
E.S.INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court