The High Court of Karnataka, in a regular second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC, granted time to comply with office objections; non-compliance led to the dismissal of the appeal without reference to the Bench.
The appeal is dismissed as the appellant failed to comply with the order to address office objections within the granted time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2246 OF 2018
BETWEEN
SMT.S.YASHODAMMA W/O LATE RAJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDENT OF ANTHANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 116
... APPELLANT/S
(By Sri. : CHETHAN.B, ADVOCATE)
AND
RANGEGOWDA S/O LATE BUSEKALLEGOWDA, SINCE DIED BY LRS I.E., RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 6 HEREIN
…2
RSA NO.2246/2018
2
RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 6 ARE
RESIDING AT ANTHANAHALLI VILLAGE,
…3
RSA NO.2246/2018
3
KASABA HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 116
W/O DEVARAJU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDENT OF MATTANAVILE VILLAGE, SHRAVANABELAGOLA HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT—573 116
... RESPONDENT/S
THIS REGULER SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER
SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.03.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO.70/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.07.2015 PASSED IN O.S.NO.140/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA.
…4
RSA NO.2246/2018
4
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the
Court made the following Order.
ORDER
Two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections,
failing which the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Sd/- JUDGE
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 10.08.2021, office objection is not complied with, hence appeal shall be dismissed.
COPY
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By : SV R By : PH C By : DS
Ty Dt : 17.11.2021 C.Dt : 19.11.2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT.S.YASHODAMMA W/O LATE RAJEGOWDA
RANGEGOWDA S/O LATE BUSEKALLEGOWDA
SMT.SHANTHAMMA W/O RANGEGOWDA
SMT.BABY D/O KAPANIGOWDA
SRI.SWAMY S/O KAPANIGOWDA
SRI.ASHOK S/O KAPANIGOWDA
E.S.INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
