Sri Ramanjanappa v. Smt Kamalamma
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed a regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC for non-prosecution, as the appellant failed to comply with a time limit granted to address office objections.
This court dismissed a regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC for non-prosecution, as the appellant failed to comply with a time limit granted to address office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1811 OF 2018
BETWEEN
…2
RSA NO.1811/2018
2
THE APPELLANTS ALL ARE R/AT: RAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-560 064 ... APPELLANT/S
(By Sri. : C.RAVI KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND SMT KAMALAMMA SINCE DEAD BY LRS,
…3
RSA NO.1811/2018
3
…4
RSA NO.1811/2018
4
SMT. RATHNAMMA D/O LATE ANJANAPPA, W/O LATE VENKATARAYAPPA SINCE DEAD BY LRS,
…5
RSA NO.1811/2018
5
…6
RSA NO.1811/2018
6
THE RESPONDENTS NO.11 AND 12 BOTH ARE RESIDING AT RAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-560064
…7
RSA NO.1811/2018
7
.. RESPONDENT/S
THIS REGULER SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.03.2018 PASSED IN RA NO.65/2014, ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.01.2014 PASSED IN OS NO.1890/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order.
…8
RSA NO.1811/2018
8
ORDER
Finally three weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for nonprosecution without reference to Bench.
Sd/-
JUDGE
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 24.09.2021, office objection is not
complied with, hence appeal shall stand dismissed.
COPY
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By : SV R By : PH C By : HKV Ty Dt : 17.01.2022 C.Dt : 18.01.2022
SRI RAMANJANAPPA S/O LATE ANJINAPPA AND OTHERS
SMT KAMALAMMA SINCE DEAD BY LRS AND OTHERS
E.S.INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court