defendant was mutated as per Ex.D2 and his name is also shown in the RTC extracts as per Ex.D3, D13 and D23, with respect to Sy.No.6, 7 and 10 respectively for the year 1992-93 and the mutation was also made in the year 1991-92 with respect to the suit properties in the name of the de3fendant and he has also produced tax paid receipts as per ExD.33 to D.35 and he has also produced the copy of the Patta Book as per Ex.D36. The said Ex.D36 and Ex.D1 and the RTCS Ex.D3, D13 and Ex.D23 are all clearly goes to show that the defendant is in possession and enjoyment of suit properties since from 1991-92. The plaintiff has no manner of right, title or interest over the suit property and entire case of the appellant-plaintiff is goes in vain. The appellant/plaintiff has failed to prove his case and all the grounds urged in the appeal are all goes in vain. The evidence of DW1 and the documents produced by him i.e., Ex.D1 to Ex.D41 are clearly disproves the entire case of the appellant/ plaintiff. Further it is relevant to state here that, the appellant/plaintiff has challenged the sale deed executed by him dated 05.07.191 in favour of the defendant as per Ex.D1 and the limitation for challenging the document is three years from the date of execution of Ex.D1 but the appellant/plaintiff has filed this suit on 29.01.1997, which is clearly barred by time from the knowledge of execution of Ex.D1”
