HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of learned counsel for the appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
R.S.A. NO.1273 OF 2014 (SP)
BETWEEN:
SRI.B.VENKATARAMANAPPA REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS.,
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.LOKESH R, ADVOCATE)
2
AND:
(BY SRI.DEVARAJ.N, ADVOCATE FOR C/R.1)
3
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.08.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.45/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, SIT AT ANEKAL, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:17.08.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO.228/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN) AND JMFC., ANEKAL.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
This Court by order dated 23.07.2021 passed the following order;
"Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. No representation.
If the matter is not prosecuted by the next date of hearing, the same shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution on the next date of hearing.
List this matter on 18.08.2021."
session, no representation on behalf of the appellants and thereafter, the matter was passed over. When the
4
appeal is taken up again in the afternoon session, no representation on behalf of the appellant.
present.
the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
NBM
SRI B.VENKATARAMANAPPA
SRI.RAGHU
SMT.ANITHA
SRI.RAVI
SRI.KRISHNAPPA
E.S.INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court