Smt. Anitha v. T S Venkatesha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed two regular appeals filed under Section 100 of CPC, which were withdrawn by the appellant with the leave of the court.
What did the court decide?
The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
R.S.A.NO.12/2020 (INJ)
C/W. R.S.A.NO.1725/2019 (INJ)
IN R.S.A.NO.12/2020:
BETWEEN:
SMT. ANITHA, AGED 42 YEARS, W/O MANJUNATHA, R/O ANAGHA TRADERS, DEVARAJ URS ROAD, KADUR TOWN – 577027, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT. … APPELLANT
[BY SRI VIGHNESHWAR S.SHASTRI, ADVOCATE]
AND:
- T.S. VENKATESHA, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O T.V. SRINIVASA IYENGAR, R/O KOTE KADUR TOWN, CHIKKAMGALURU DISTRICT – 577547.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SMT. ANITHA
- respondent
T.S. VENKATESHA
Coram
H.P. SANDESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/12/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court