Dismissed

Sanjeeva v. Smt Honnamma

Karnataka HC21 Oct 2021RSA/1054/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a regular second appeal, the High Court of Karnataka allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn with the respondents having no objection. Click here to read more. This is a summary of the judgment, not legal advice. The judgment deals with the withdrawal of a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

What did the court decide?

The appellant was permitted to withdraw the second appeal and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

Sanjeeva Vs Smt Honnamma — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶6

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.1054 OF 2017

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SANJEEVA S/O.LATE KORAGU SAPALYA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS R/AT SHRUTHI TOWERS MUDIPU MITHAKODI HOUSE KURNADU VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT – 574 143 ... APPELLANT

¶9

(BY SRI G.RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

SMT.HONNAMMA

¶12

W/O.SESAPPA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS R/AT ANGANIMARUMANE KURNADU VILLAGE & POST BANTWAL TALUK

¶13

D.K.DISTRICT – 574 143

¶14

SMT.SUNEETHA

¶15

W/O.PUSPANANDA MAJOR

¶16

R/AT ANGANIMARUMANE KURNADU VILLAGE & POST BANTWAL TALUK

¶17

D.K.DISTRICT – 574 143

¶18

SMT.PUSHPAVATHI W/O.LATE M.VENKAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS

¶19

¶20

YADAVA SAPALYA S/O.LATE VENKAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

¶21

CHANDRAHASA S/O.LATE M.VENKAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

¶22

ANANDA S/O.LATE M.VENKAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

¶23

BHUJANGA S/O.LATE M.VENKAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R-3 TO R-7 ARE R/AT MITHAKODY HOUSE KURNADU VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK D.K.DISTRICT – 574 143

¶24

8.	SMT.BHAVANI W/O.LATE M.VASU AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS R/AT KAJUBADAJE VILLAGE HOSANGADY, VIA MANJESHWARA KASARGOD TALUK & DISTRICT – 671 323
9.	M.KESHAVA S/O.LATE ISHWARA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
10.	M.SATHISHA S/O.LATE ISHWARA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
	R-9 AND R-10 ARE R/AT MENKOLIGULI PAJEERU VILLAGE KURNADU POST BANTWAL TALUK
	D.K.DISTRICT – 574 143 … RESPONDENTS
(BY R	SRI V.R.PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE R-2; -1, R-3 TO R-10 ARE SERVED) *****

¶25

¶26

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.01.2017 PASSED IN RA.NO.22/2012 BY THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANTWAL, D.K. CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.03.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.150/2003 BY THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANTWAL, DAKSHINA KANNADA & ETC.

¶27

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶28

J U D G M E N T

¶29

Learned counsel appearing for appellant has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. Said memo is signed by appellant as well as learned counsel appearing for appellant.

¶30

Learned counsel appearing for respondents has no

¶31

objection for such withdrawal.

¶32

Memo is placed on record.

¶33

Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as

¶34

withdrawn.

¶35

Sd/JUDGE

¶36

Sanjeeva v. Smt Honnamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeeva v. Smt Honnamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Bette Gowda Vs Sri. K v Naidu

Govindaraju Vs State of Karnataka

Mr Prabhakar Murthy Vs Mr M S Shivakumar

Sri Harijanara Raghu Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Chennarayappa Vs Sri Munivenkatappa

Narayana Vs N Deepak