Dismissed
Thimmamma v. Puttaiah
Karnataka HCRSA/1010/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This appeal against an order refusing to entertain a maintaining second appeal was dismissed, but with liberty to file a regular appeal challenging the trial court's order.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to file a regular appeal before the First Appellate Court challenging the trial court order; time consumed in this appeal considered for limitation.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
¶3
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021
¶4
- BEFORE
¶5
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
¶6
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1010 OF 2016
¶7
BETWEEN:
¶8
- THIMMAMMA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, W/O LATE DASEGOWDA, G-DODDERI VILLAGES, MAYASANDRA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
¶9
- MARIYAKKA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, D/O LATE DASEGOWDA, W/O RAJANNA, LAKKENAHALLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT.
¶10
- KEMPAMMA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, D/O LATE DASEGOWDA, W/O MARIYANNA, NARIGEHALLI VILLAGE, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKURU DISRICT.
¶11
- DOLLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O LATE DASEGOWDA, G-DODDERI VILLAGE, MAYASANDRA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether to dismiss the regular second appeal filed under S. 100 r/w Order XLII of CPC, 1908.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
THIMMAMMA
- appellant
MARIYAKKA
- appellant
KEMPAMMA
- appellant
DOLLEGOWDA
- appellant
DASEGOWDA
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/1010/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court