In this regular second appeal arising from a partition suit, the High Court of Karnataka allowed the appellant's counsel to withdraw the appeal as the matter was settled before the Lok Adalath.
Leave granted to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.100052/2018
BETWEEN:
SMT. RATNAVVA W/O. VIJAYKUMAR MAHAJAN, AGE 52 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. H.NO.169, PATIL GALLI, NEAR KESHAVANATH MANDIR, SANGLI – 416416, MAHARASHTRA STATE.
... APPELLANT
(SRI. MRUTYUNJAYA TATA BANGI, ADVOCATE FOR APELLANT)
AND
2
R/O. ALLAPUR – 581117, TALUKA : KUNDGOL, DIST. DHARWAD.
GURUSIDDAPPA SHIVAPPA MYAGERI, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS L.RS.
SMT. BASAVVA W/O. VIJAYAKUMAR KATTI, SINCE DECEASED BY HER L.RS.
RESPONDENT NO.6 BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL FATHER VIJAYKUMAR ISHWARAPPA KATTI, AGE 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRI & BUSINESS, R/O. HUDCO COLONY, SIDDALINGESHWAR NAGAR, GADAG – 582101.
3
... RESPONDENTS
(SRI. B.D.HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 & 2; SRI. S.C.BHUTI, ADVOCATE FOR R3; R4, R7 & R9 ARE SERVED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 READ WITH ORDER 42 RULE 1 OF CPC, 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.11.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO.112/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, KUNDGOL, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.06.2016, PASSED IN O.S.NO.4/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, KUNDGOL, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITIO AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS RSA COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, THE COURT, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating
that the matter is settled before the Lok Adalath and seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
4
Learned counsel for the respondents affirms the same.
Taking the memo on record, the appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
*Svh/-
SMT. RATNAVVA W/O. VIJAYKUMAR MAHAJAN
SHRI. NANDEPPA CHANABASAPPA MYAGERI
SMT. NEELAVVA W/O. CHANABASAPPA MYAGERI
SHRI. ISHWARAPPA S/O. NANDEPPA MYAGERI
SMT. SHANTAVVA W/O. GURUSIDDAPPA MYAGERI
KUMARI VARSHA D/O. VIJAYKUMAR KATTI
RAVI V.HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
