Mallesha v. sushama
Case brief
What is this about?
P.H. filed R.P.F.C. challenging Rs.3,000/m maintenance for three children, claiming inability to pay. High Court affirmed Trial Court's finding that amount just covers costs and dismissed petition.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed; maintenance order of Rs.3,000 per month for each child affirmed as adequate.
What the court decided
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
R.P.F.C. NO.95/2019
BETWEEN :
MALLESHA S/O BEEREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESIDING AT CHANCHAAHALLI YALANDUR TALUK CHAMRAJANAGAR DISTRICT PIN CODE: 571441.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAJU C N, ADVOCATE)
AND :
- SUSHAMA W/O MALLESHA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RESIDING AT #93 NEAR RAGHAVENDRASWAMY MUTT THONICHIKOPPAL MYSORE - 570002.
- ASHWINI
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision petition challenging the maintenance order for children should be allowed.
Whether the Rs.3,000/- per month maintenance awarded to each child is adequate considering education costs and petitioner's income.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MALLESHA S/O BEEREGOWDA
- respondent
SUSHAMA W/O MALLESHA
- respondent
ASHWINI
- respondent
MEGHANA
- respondent
SHIVAKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- RPFC/95/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court