Petitioner did not appear. The petition under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act challenging the CRL.Misc. order was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
RPFC NO.171 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
CHETHAN KUMAR S/O APPAYYANNA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NALLUR HATTI CHELURU HOBALI GUBBI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI SIDDARAMAIAH H.S., ADV.)
AND
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT MADENAHALLY MAJURE EARAPPANAHATTI CHELURU HOBALI GUBBI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS
2
THIS PETITON FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 17.08.2016 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.416/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUBBI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION UNDER SECTION 125 OF CR.P.C., FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Today also none appears for the petitioner.
petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
KG
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Chethan Kumar S/o Appayanna
Padma @ Doddamma W/o Chethankumar
Yogananda S/o Chethan Kumar
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
