grand-mother as P.W.1 and relied upon the documents Exs.P1 to P26 particularly, the documents Exs.P3 and P4-khatha certificates and so also, Ex.P24 - the certified copy of the sale deed dated 23.12.1991 and also Ex.P25 – the certified copy of the registered sale deed. Apart from that, D.W.1 during the course of cross-examination, categorically admitted that item No.1 of the plaint schedule is his ancestral property. But, he cannot say whether item No.2 of the plaint schedule is also the ancestral property and says that, if some time is given, he can verify and submit. He also admits that he has produced the original documents pertaining to item No.1 of the plaint schedule. The original document in respect of item No.2 has been given to the purchaser i.e., defendant No.3. He admits that, there was a partition between himself and his younger brother in the year 1963. He admits that the sale deed dated 23.12.1981 executed in respect of item No.2 of the plaint schedule is the document at Ex.P24. It is also not in dispute that item No.1 of the plaint schedule is a house consisting of ground and first floor and the defendants are in occupation of both the floors. D.W.1 also admits that item No.2 of the plaint schedule is a commercial property. He also admits that he is a
