The Bangalore High Court disposed of a revision application filed under section 96 of the CPC. Counsel for the appellants moved for withdrawal. The court framed the issue regarding the withdrawal of the appeal.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
R.F.A.NO.665/2006 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
1 . SRI H.CHANDRASHEKHAR RAO S/O LATE H. PURNAIAH AGE: MAJOR RESIDING AT NO.52/3 SARAKKI VILLAGE BENGALURU-560 013.
2 . SRI H.ANIL KUMAR S/O SRI H.A.K.RAO AGE: MAJOR RESIDING AT NO.68 I BLOCK EAST, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU-560 013. … APPELLANTS
[BY SRI P.R.MOHAN RAO, ADVOCATE]
AND:
1 . M/S. GLOBAL TELE SYSTEMS LTD., REGISTERED OFFICE AT G-2 MANOJ INDUSTRIAL ESTATE NO.40-A, DR.AMBEDKAR MARG WADLA, MUMBAI-400 031 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
[BY SRI RANGARAJAN AND
SRI PRABHAKHARAN, ADVOCATES FOR R1; R2-SERVED]
2
THIS R.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER XXI RULE 103 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 13.12.2005 PASSED ON I.A. IN EXECUTION NO.763/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-19), ALLOWING THE I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER XXI RULE 97 TO 101 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC SEEKING TO STAY ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE.
THIS R.F.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING THROUGH ‘VIDEO CONFERENCE’ THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellants through video
conference submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
The submission of the learned counsel for the appellants is placed on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
ST
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the filed appeal under section 96 of the CPC should be allowed to proceed given the appellant's request to withdraw it.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri H. Chandrashekhara Rao
Sri H. Anil Kumar
M/s. Global Tele Systems Ltd.
Principal General Manager Bangalore Telecom District
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
