Dismissed
Mrs Rathnamma v. Mr C Anand
Karnataka HCRFA/503/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
R.F.A.No.503/2017(RES)
BETWEEN :
R/AT DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI VILLAGE
BEGUR HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS W/O. MR. NARAYANA REDDY R/AT HONGASANDRA VILLAGE BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK
...APPELLANTS
(BY Sri. SANTOSH S GOGI, ADVOCATE)
AND :
1 . MR C ANAND AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O CHIKKA NANJAPPA R/AT NO. 39/12, APPAREDDY PALYA INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 038
2 . MR. R KODANDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS S/O RAMAIAH REDDY R/AT NO. 499, 1ST CROSS BANASWADI, R M NAGAR MAIN ROAD BANGALORE - 560 043
3 . MR. H. NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O HANUMAPPA R/AT BANASAWADI, BANGALORE - 560 043
4 . MR. RAMAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O LATE REDDAPPA R/AT HOUSE LIST NO.4 DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI BOMMANAHALLI ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 076 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G. PAPIREDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3, R4 SERVED)
THIS R.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER ON IA.NO.9 IN EX.NO.3061.2013 ON THE FILE OF THE XI ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE BANGALORE CCH-8 DISMISSING THE IA.NO.9 FILED BY THE APPELICANTS 1 TO 6 IS NOT MAINTAINABLE, APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 97 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit
that the appeal does not survive for consideration in view of the execution petition being closed on 16.07.2019. A memo is filed to the said effect.
The memo is placed on record.
The appeal stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
In view of the disposal of the main appeal, all
pending I.As. stand disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
PMR
Mrs. Rathnamma
Mrs. Neelamma
Mrs. Kanakamma
Mrs. Thimmakka
Mrs. Rukkamma
Mrs. Ramakka
S. Sujatha
E.S. Indiresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court