The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal under Section 96 of CPC as withdrawn on the merits by the appellant filed a memo of withdrawal. The court took no substantive order is considered withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
R.F.A.No.43/2019 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
SMT. B.D.MAHADEVI, W/O B.C.BOMMEGOWDA, D/O DEVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT No.216/A, 5TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, 4TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034.
… APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PRAKASHA.K.V, ADV.)
AND:
BOTH ARE R/AT No.6, 21 “A” NEAR GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, EJIPURA, VIVEKNAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 047.
2
R/AT No.70, 2ND D MAIN, NEAR LAWREVANCE SCHOOL, KORAMANGALA 8TH BLOCK, BANGALORE - 560 034
… RESPONDENTS
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 OF RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.07.2017 PASSED IN OS.No.2146/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ARAVIND KUMAR , J. , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
praying to withdraw the appeal.
Memo is placed on record. Appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
GH
SMT. B.D.MAHADEVI
SRI. RAJAPPA
SMT. R.UMARANI
SRI. BALARAJU.A.
A.RAVIND KUMAR
N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
