Sri Syed Kareem Anjum v. Sri Rajendra
Case brief
What is this about?
No substantive issues were discussed, but the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-compliance with compliance orders issued earlier by the court.
No substantive issues were discussed, but the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-compliance with compliance orders issued earlier by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 32 OF 2021
BETWEEN
SRI SYED KAREEM ANJUM S/O LATE SYED NOORULLA @ WAZEER, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.76, 5TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, TIPPU NAGAR, MYSORE ROAD, CHAMARAJAPET, BANGALORE ...Appellant
(By Sriyuths: A GOPIPRAKASH, ARPITHA G.A., Advocates)
AND
1 . SRI RAJENDRA S/O.R.MUNISWAMY, R/AT 118/1, NEW KAHATA NO.69/2 (OLD KATHA NO.69) SITE NO.20, 1ST MAIN 15TH CROSS, GUDDADAHALLI EXTENSION, WARD NO.42 BAPUJINAGAR, BANGALORE
2 . SMT PALANIYAMMAL D/O MADHAVAN, R/AT 118/1, NEW KAHATA NO.69/2, (OLD KATHA NO.69), SITE NO.20, 1ST MAIN, 15TH CROS, GUDADAHALLI EXTENSION, WARD NO.42, BAPUJINAGAR, BANGALORE
RFA.No.32/2021 2
3 . THE BANGALORE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.3, PAMPAMAHA KAVI ROAD, CHAMARJAPET BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANGER, N.MANJUNATH …Respondents
This Regular First Appeal filed U/o 41 Rule 1 R/W Sec. 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree dated: 25.10.2019 passed in O.S. No. 26812/2011 on the file of the LXXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU, Dismissing the suit for declaration and recovery of possession and mesne profit and cost.
This Regular First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Counsel for appellant absent. No representation.
Compliance to be effected before the closure of office
hours on 29.01.2021, failing which appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
RFA.No.32/2021 3
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt. 19.01.2021, Office objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed for nonprosecution.
T By: MP COPY R By: JS C By: TS Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI SYED KAREEM ANJUM
SRI RAJENDRA
SMT PALANIYAMMAL
THE BANGALORE CITY CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court