Appeal against civil suit decree for declaration, partition and mesne profits dismissed for non-prosecution as appellants failed to appear and were absent in second round.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1753/2014 (PAR)
BETWEEN :
D/O LATE ALBERT D’SOUZA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT MULECHCHI HOUSE, PERUVAUI VILLAGE, BANTWAL TALUK, MANGALORE DISTRICT-575001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI S V MANJUNATHA, ADV.)
AND :
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.09.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.09/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CITY CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANTWAL, D.K., DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION, PARTITION AND FUTURE MESNE PROFITS AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
None appear for the appellants even in the second round.
Counsel appearing for the appellants is not supported
by any acknowledgement of the appellants for having received the file, as stated in the memo. It appears the appellants are not serious in prosecuting the matter.
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
JT/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT ANITHA D’SOUZA & ORS
SMT PHILOMINA D’SOUZA & ORS
S. SUJATHA
E.S.INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
