Dismissed
H D Gangadhara v. J K Lokesh
Karnataka HCRFA/1585/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
R.F.A.No.1585 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
H D GANGADHARA SON OF LATE T DODDALAKKAIAH AGED 63 YEARS R/AT MAHALAKSHMI POWERLOOM INDUSTRY, NEW LAKSHMINARASIMHAN SWAMY SAW MILL, BANASHANKARI BADAVANE, CHIKKNAYAKANAHALLI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 214.
..APPELLANT
(BY SRI M R VIJAYARAGHAVAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
J K LOKESH 33 YEARS SON OF LATE H J KADARAIAH R/AT NO. 190/1, MATHRUSHREE NILAYA, 6TH MAIN, 5TH CROSS SACHIDANANDANAGAR, KENGERI SATILLITE TOWN, BANGALORE-560060 REPRESENTED BY HIS PA HOLDER J K GURUSWAMY, 28 YEARS SON OF H J KADARAIAH R/AT NO. 108, ANNAPURNA HALEPALYA POST, TIPTUR TALUK TUMKUR DIST-572 202.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.G.SHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R)
R.F.A.No.1585/2013
2
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.09.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.4629/2011 ON THE FILE OF XIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
This R.F.A. coming on for Orders, through Physical Hearing/Video Conferencing Hearing, this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
None appear in this matter either physically or through video conference. No reasons are forthcoming for their nonappearance.
A perusal of the order sheet would go to show that, inspite of granting sufficient opportunities, the appellant has not filed the paper book.
On 19.02.2021, while granting six weeks time to file paper book, the court had made observation that, in case, paper books are not filed within six weeks, the appeal shall be listed for necessary orders. Thereafter, on 25.11.2021 also the appellant remained absent, still this court granted him a month's time to do the needful, despite which, the appellant has neither
R.F.A.No.1585/2013
3
appeared nor filed the paper book. As such, appeal stands dismissed for non-filing of paper book and non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
SBN
H D GANGADHARA
J K LOKESH
H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court