The Registry filed a RFA against a civil judgment dismissing a suit for declaration and permanent injunction. The appellants sought dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn out of court. The court dismissed the appeal as not pressed.
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
R.F.A.No.1227 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
2
RFA No. 1227/2012
(BY SMT.N.SHASHIKALA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
3. MR.NAGESH
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
3
RFA No. 1227/2012
ALL 1 TO 10 ARE RESIDING AT HORMAVU AGARA VILLAGE, HORMAVU POST, BANGALORE -43
RFA No. 1227/2012
4
I BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE -560 032 14. M/s.BANJARA DEVELOPERS & CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. NO.418, I MAIN, I BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR BANGALORE -560 032 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
RFA No. 1227/2012
5
BANGALORE -560 042.
ALL 18 TO 22 ARE RESIDING AT NO.2, LAZAR LAYOUT FRAZER TOWN BANGALORE -560 005. ..RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.KALYAN BASAVARAJ S., ADVOCATE FOR R-12, SRI.M.JAGADISH, ADVOCATE FOR R-15 & R-16, SRI.JOSHUA H.SAMUEL, ADVOCATE FOR R-19 & R-21, R-1, R-2, R-4, R-5, R-6, R-7, R-8, R-9, R-13, R-14, R-17, R-18, R-20 & R-22 SERVED)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.12.2011 PASSED IN O.S.NO.16795/2004, ON THE FILE OF THE XXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, AT MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
RFA No. 1227/2012
6
This R.F.A. coming on for Orders, through Physical Hearing/Video Conferencing Hearing, this day, the Court made the following :
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the appellants who is physically present in the Court files a Memo stating that the matter has been settled out of the Court, as such, the appellants are not pressing the above appeal. With this, she prays for dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn.
Learned counsel for the appellants has made supporting submission on the lines of the Memo.
In view of the Memo and the supporting submission,
the Appeal stands dismissed as not pressed.
Registry to proceed further with RFA No.491/2012,
in accordance with law.
MBB
Sd/JUDGE
2 provisions across 2 enactments
MRS.KALPANA MALLA
MR.LAXMAN RAO MALLA
MRS. PREETI KANSAL
MR.ANANTH KANSAL
MRS.RATHNAMMA
MR.NAGESH
H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
