Mr Mohan Anandan v. Nil
Case brief
What is this about?
The Karnataka High Court dismissed this second appeal for non-prosecution after noting the appellants' consistent failure to appear or comply with office objections despite seven notices.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance with orders.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
R.F.A.No.110 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
- MR MOHAN ANANDAN SON OF ANANDAN AGED 55 YEARS, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF NO.339
1ST STAGE, KHB COLONY, BASAVESHWARA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560079 KARNATAKA STATE, INDIA, AND ALSO AT UNIT-814 145 HILLCREST AVENUE, MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIA L5B 321 CANADA
- MRS. SATHYA RAGHAVAN DAUGHTER OF SRI.N.S.RAGHAVAN AND MRS.SHANTHI RAGHAVAN, AGED 47 YEARS, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF NO.339
1ST STAGE, KHB COLONY, BASAVESHWARA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560079 KARNATAKA STATE, INDIA, AND ALSO AT UNIT-814 NO.145 HILLCREST AVENUE, MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIA L5B 321 CANADA
- MRS.PADMA SHEKAR
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal before this court should be allowed where the appellants failed to appear after being given sufficient opportunities.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
MR MOHAN ANANDAN
- appellant
MRS. SATHYA RAGHAVAN
- appellant
MRS.PADMA SHEKAR
- respondent
NIL
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/110/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court