perused the records. It is not in dispute that father of the claimants D. Gurusiddaiah, died in the road traffic accident on 07th May, 2011. Though the learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company argued with regard to the liability, however, the respondent-Insurance Company having satisfied the award in full as per memo dated 27th August, 2013 filed before the Tribunal, we do not find any merit in the submission of Sri K. Govindraj learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance Company with regard to liability. However, with regard to reassessment of the quantum of compensation, as per the salary certificate of the deceased marked at Exhibit P58, the annual salary of the deceased was Rs.3,61,272/-. After deducting Income tax and professional tax, the net annual salary of the deceased was Rs.3,38,745/-. In terms of the law declared by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of SARLA VERMA AND OTHERS v. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANOTHER reported in 2009 ACJ 1298, the appropriate multiplier would be 11 and one-third of the income is to be deducted towards the personal expenses of the deceased. Even after adding loss of consortium as per the law declared by the Hon'ble Supreme
