This Miscellaneous First Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant's own counsel. Consequently, the pending interim applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.F.A.No.997/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.997/2021 (AA)
BETWEEN:
THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT – HASSAN ‘KANAKA NILAYA’, KHATA NO.738 5TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND CROSS INDRANAGAR, SATHYAMANGLA LAYOUT HASSAN – 573 201 REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR …APPELLANT
(BY SMT. SHILPA SHAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M.F.A.No.997/2021
2
NELAMANGALA – HASSAN SECTION (NH-48) K.R.S. AGRAHARA, B.M.ROAD KUNIGAL TOWN, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 130 REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER ..RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37(1)(C) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.10.2020 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN A.S.NO.159/2019.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned Counsel for the appellant submits memo
for withdrawal of the appeal. Recording the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending IAs stood disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KSR
THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT – HASSAN
SRI M.B.PUTTARUDRAIAH
THE ARBITRATOR AND SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT NELAMANGALA – HASSAN SECTION
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
K.S.MUDAGAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
