Allowed

The Manager v. Salma Banu

Karnataka HC3 Mar 2021MFA/8857/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a miscellaneous first appeal filed by an insurance company against an arbitration award. Counsel submitted a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The court allowed the withdrawal and ordered the deposited amount be transmitted to the concerned tribunal.

What did the court decide?

Appellant permitted to withdraw the appeal; deposited amount to be transmitted to the concerned tribunal.

The Manager Vs Salma Banu — Insurance | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 03^RD DAY OF MARCH, 2021 BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI

¶5

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.8857 of 2017 (WC)

¶6

BETWEEN :

¶7

THE MANAGER BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED M.G.PALACE BESIDES KARNATAKA BANK GPI CIRCLE, SHIVAMOGA

¶8

¶9

BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD REGIONAL OFFICE, GOLDEN HEIGHTS 4^TH LEVEL, NO.1/2, 59^TH CROSS 4^TH “M” BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE – 560 010 BY ITS MANAGER

¶10

... APPELLANT

¶11

(BY SRI O.MAHESH, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

SALMA BANU, AGED 27 YEARS Q/O LATE NISAR AHMED

¶14

RABIYA BANU @ SANIYA AGED ABOUT 5 YEAR D/O LATE NISAR AHAMED

¶15

BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHR RESPONDENT NO.1

¶16

¶17

ZEENATHUNNISA, AGE 66 YEAR M/O LATE NISAR AHAMED

¶18

MUBEENA, AGE 26 YEAR D/O LAE DADAPEER (SISTER OF LATE NISAR AHAMED)

¶19

ALL ARE R/O D.NO.2048, WARD NO.10, KALAMMANA BEEDI HOSADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT – 577 501

¶20

E.V.VIJAY KUMAR, AGE 61 YEAR, S/O VAJRAPPA PROP: VIJAYA MOTORS R/O HOSADURGA – 577 614 ...RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SMT.NITHYA.V, ADVOCATE FOR SRI PRAKASH.M.H FOR R5, R2 IS MINOR REP BY R1; R1 AND 4 ARE SERVED)

¶22

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 30(1) OF WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 25.09.2017 PASSED IN ECA NO.3/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, & JMFC, HOSADURGA, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.4,91,000/- WITH INTEREST @ 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITON TILL DEPOSIT.

¶23

THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶24

J U D G M E N T

¶25

Sri.O.Mahesh, learned counsel for appellant has

¶26

appeared through video conferencing. Smt. Nithya V,

¶27

¶28

learned counsel for respondent No.5, has appeared in person.

¶29

2. Learned counsel submits that a memo for

¶30

withdrawal of the appeal is filed.

¶31

Submission is noted.

¶32

4. The memo reads as under:

¶33

"This Hon'ble court be pleased to permit the appellant to withdraw above appeal and further be pleased to order office to send amount in deposit to concern tribunal in the interest of justice".

¶34

Perused the contents of memo.

¶35

The appellant is permitted to withdraw the

¶36

appeal. The amount in deposit before this Court shall be transmitted to the Tribunal concerned.

¶37

Sd/JUDGE

¶38

nms

The Manager v. Salma Banu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Manager v. Salma Banu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Special Land Acquisition Officer Vs Sri Ramaiah

Smt Lakshmidevamma Vs Sri H D Veerabhadrappa

B.G.Sarojamma Vs Special Land Acquisition Officer

Mr Bahauddin Ahmed Vs Mangaluru Institute of Fire

B. G. Puttaswamy Vs Sri. Nanjegowda

Jasti Saibabu Vs C H Lakshmi Malathi