K C Deepak v. Sandesh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the Miscellaneous First Appeal under the MV Act for want of prosecution as the appellant was absent and counsel retired from the case.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
MFA 8555/2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
M.F.A.No.8555/2014 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
K.C.Deepak, S/o K.B.Channakeshava, Aged about 23 years, R/o Kodathalu, Thekkur Post, Sringeri Taluk-577 139.
… APPELLANT
(By Sri Chandrashekar, Adv. for M/s.Chandru & S.Shekar Assts.)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first appeal should be admitted in the absence of the appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.C.Deepak
- respondent
Sandesh
- respondent
K.R.Thimmappa Hegde
- respondent
The Manager, United Ins. Co. Ltd.
- respondent
Dharmappa A.M
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/8555/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court