Appeal against rejection of temporary injunction filed petitioner sold property. Trial Court to dispose suit expeditiously; pending applications disposed.
The appeal is disposed of without any order passed. Pending I.As. stood disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.F.A.NO.7029/2015
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7029/2015(CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT.RAJAMMA W/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS NO.10, NEW CORPORATION QUARTERS SHESHDRIPURAM BENGALURU – 560 020 … APPELLANT
(BY SRI K.N.SRINIVASA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
ABOVE 1 TO 4 ARE R/AT NO.2145, NEAR ASWINI BAR MUNIKRISHNAPPA COMPOUND KAMMAGONDANAHALLI JALAHALLI WEST, BENGALURU – 560 015
M.F.A.NO.7029/2015
2
(BY SRI.SANTHOSH, ADVOCATE FOR R5; R1 TO R4 ARE SERVED)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 (R) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 03.07.2015 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN O.S.NO.5691/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, ISSUING EMERGENT SUIT SUMMONS AND EMERGENT NOTICE OF IA.1.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Aggrieved by the rejection of her application for temporary injunction to restrain the respondentsdefendants from alienating the suit schedule property, the plaintiff has preferred the above appeal.
property to respondent No.5. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 submits undertaking affidavit of respondent No.5 to the effect that till disposal of the
M.F.A.NO.7029/2015
3
suit she will not alienate the property except for renting out.
The trial Court is requested to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. In view of disposal of the appeal, pending I.As. stood disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
pgg
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT.RAJAMMA
SMT.YASHODAMMA
SRI.M.SHANTHAKUMAR
SRI.M.GANGADHAR
SRI.M.V.CHETHAN
SMT.R.VENKARAMANAMMA
K.S.MUDAGAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
