Appeal dismissed as not pressed. Appellant filed memo indicating lack of inclination to prosecute the appeal against a judgment partly allowing divorce petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE Mrs. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON'BLE Mrs. JUSTICE M. G. UMA
M.F.A. No.7022 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
SMT. SHRIVIDYA K. S. W/O DILIP H. R. AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/A No.432, HOSPITAL STREET, OLD SBM BUILDING KONANUR – 573130 ARKALGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT
PRESENTLY R/AT: No.550, 2ND FLOOR, NEHARU ROAD, KAMMANAHALLI, KALYANA NAGAR BENGALURU – 560084 ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. DILIP H. R. S/O DR. RAMESH H. P. AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT No.119, 3RD MAIN ROAD, T.K.LAYOUT MYSURU – 570009 .. RESPONDENT
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.04.2019 PASSED IN M.C.NO.169/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S 13(1)(ia) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
-: 2 :-
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
It is noted that Sriyuths T.Seshagiri and Sunil S Rao,
counsel, have filed Vakalathnama on behalf of the appellant wherein no objection has been mentioned by the previous counsel.
In view of the same, office to henceforth show the name of Sri T.Seshagiri as counsel for the appellant and delete the name of Sri.G.Balakrishna Shastry, counsel, from the cause list.
Memo is taken on record and perused.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Consequently, I.A.1/2019 is also dismissed as not pressed.
rs
Smt. Shrividya K. S.
Sri. Dilip H. R.
B.V. Nagarathna
M. G. Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court