Sri C Somashekar v. Smt S Roopa
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal filed against custody order was dismissed as having no cause because the minor child had attained majority by the time the appeal was considered.
Appeal filed against custody order was dismissed as having no cause because the minor child had attained majority by the time the appeal was considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.DESAI
M.F.A.No.6585/2015 (GW)
BETWEEN :
1 . SRI C.SOMASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, NO.16, OPP. ITI COLLEGE, RAGI MISSION ROAD, KEMGUTTE, MALLATHAHALLI, BANGALORE-560056
2 . SMT.VIJAYA W/O SRI C.SOMASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, NO.16, OPP. ITI COLLEGE, RAGIN MISSION ROAD, KEMGUTTE, MALLATHAHALLI, BANGALORE-560056
3 . SRI S.SATHISH S/O SRI C.SOMASHEKAR , AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, NO.16, OPP. ITI COLLEGE, RAGI MISSION ROAD, KEMGUTTE, MALLATHAHALLI, BANGALORE-560056
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI PRAKASH M.H., ADV.)
AND :
SMT.S.ROOPA W/O LATE S.SANJAY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, PRESENTLY R/AT NO.26,
- 2 -
I MAIN ROAD, NEW GUDDADAHALLI, MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE -560026
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI V.B.SHIVAKUMAR, ADV.)
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 47(a) OF THE GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 07.07.2015 PASSED IN G & WC No.6/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE, ALLOWING THE PETITION UNDER SECTIONS 7 & 17 OF THE GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT, FOR DIRECTION TO HAND OVER THE CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILD.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
In view of the child having attained majority, this
appeal does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
All pending I.As. stand disposed of accordingly.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
PMR
C.Somashekar
Vijaya
S.Sathish
S.Roopa
S.Sujatha
P.N.Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court