Appeal against interim injunction order dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 17.01.2020. The appeal was argued in absentia for the appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.F.A.No.6410/2019
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6410/2019 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE R/AT NO.6/10, 1ST FLOOR, 6TH MAIN, BISMILLA NAGAR, BANNERGHATTA ROAD CROSS, BENGALURU – 560 029.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI A.KUMARAVEL, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
BOTH ARE R/AT NO.6/10, 2ND FLOOR, 6TH MAIN, BISMILLA NAGAR, BANNERGHATTA ROAD CROSS, BENGALURU – 560 029. …RESPONDENTS
M.F.A.No.6410/2019
2
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25.04.2019, PASSED ON I.A.NO.2, IN O.S.NO.2861/2017, ON THE FILE OF THE XXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-9) ALLOWING THE I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 4 OF CPC.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
No representation for the appellants. The
peremptory order dated 17.01.2020 is not complied. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
pgg
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs. Shataj Kulsum, W/o Shaik Irshad
Mr. S.A. Subhan, S/o S.A. Shukoor
Rasheed Khan, S/o Chote Sab
Javeed Khan, S/o Rasheed Khan
K.S. Mudagal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
