Disposed

Parvathegowda v. S Sathish

Karnataka HC15 Feb 2021MFA/551/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Lok Adalat proceeding for a motor vehicle accident appeal, the court facilitated a settlement between the appellant-claimant and the respondent-insurance company. The issue was resolved through conciliation without a formal legal dispute requiring articulation in the order. The matter was disposed of based on a joint settlement memo agreed upon by both parties during the conciliation session.

What did the court decide?

Summary of Delhi High Court Mandate: The court disposed of the miscellaneous first appeal by accepting a joint settlement memo where the respondent agreed to pay an additional Rs. 40,000 in full and f

Parvathegowda Vs S Sathish — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 15^th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA

¶7

¶8

SRI. M.N. UMASHANKAR, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No. 551/2019 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 26/2021)

¶10

BETWEEN

¶11

Parvathegowda S/o Marigowda, 59 years, K. Byadarahalli Village, Shanthigrama Hobli, Hassan Taluk-573 201.

¶12

... Appellant

¶13

(By Smt. A.R. Sharadamba, Advocate)

¶14

AND

¶15

S. Sathish S/o Subbegowda,

¶16

Major, Valgagere Mens Village, K.R. Pete Post and Taluk, Mandya District-571 426.

¶17

The Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office, No.1576, 1^st Floor, Vishveshwaraiah Road, Mandya-571 401. ... Respondents

¶18

(By Smt. Geetha Raj, Advocate for R-2)

¶19

¶20

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 12.09.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO. 845/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM, MEMBER, ADDL. MACT, HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶21

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶22

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶23

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶24

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

¶25

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent - Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs. 40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶26

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of

¶27

¶28

award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A.

¶29

from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶30

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant – claimant, on proper identification.

¶31

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶32

Sd/JUDGE

¶33

Sd/MEMBER

¶34

Rbv

Parvathegowda v. S Sathish

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvathegowda v. S Sathish

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Channakeshava Vs Shivaramu D

Neela @ Neelamma Vs Branch Manager

Rekha Vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Sri. Ramesh K S Vs M/S. Sri. Vinayaka Enterprises

H D Umashankar Vs v. G. Vijayakumar

Thippesha @ Thippeswamy Vs Govindappa P K