R N Deepak v. Papanna
Case brief
What is this about?
The Motor Accidents Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant was absent, the address could not be served, and no evidence of presence was submitted. Revival is possible upon appearance.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; revival may be considered if appellant appears.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
M.F.A.NO.3392/2014 (MV)
BETWEEN:
R.N.DEEPAK S/O NARAYANA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, NO.230, 27TH CROSS, II BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010.
… APPELLANT
[BY SRI R.N.DEEPAK, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
AND:
- PAPANNA S/O LATE HOMBEGOWDA, HODAGATTA VILLAGE & POST, KEREGODU HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT.
- NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, II FLOOR, SHUBHARAM COMPLEX, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R.N.DEEPAK
- respondent
PAPANNA
- respondent
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/3392/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court