Disposed

Sri Venkatesha v. Sri Suresha D D

Karnataka HC14 Aug 2021MFA/264/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Mega Lok Adalat conciliated a first appeal filed against a motor vehicle accident award. The parties settled, and the insurance company agreed to pay an additional Rs. 1,40,000 as lump-sum compensation. The appeal was disposed of by modifying the Tribunal's award accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Joint memo filed settling the matter; Insurance Company to pay Rs. 1,40,000 additional compensation in full and final settlement.

Sri Venkatesha Vs Sri Suresha D D — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE MEGA LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 14^th DAY OF AUGUST, 2021

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

¶7

¶8

SRI. VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No. 264/2019 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 1262/2021)

¶10

BETWEEN

¶11

Sri. Venkatesha S/o Kalegowda, 45 years, Muduganuru Village, Mallipatna Hobli, Arkalgud Taluk, Hassan District-573 102.

¶12

... Appellant

¶13

(By Smt. A.R. Sharadamba, Advocate)

¶14

AND

¶15

Sri. Suresha D.D. S/o Late Dasachari, Major, Doddabemmatti Village, Mallipatna Hobli, Arkalgud Taluk, Hassan District-573 102.

¶16

The Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., 1^st Floor, Manjunatha Complex, Old Bus Stand Road, Hassan-573 201.

¶17

... Respondents

¶18

(By Sri. M. Narayanappa, Advocate for R-2)

¶19

¶20

THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 01.09.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO. 257/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & MEMBER, MACT, ARKALGUD, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶21

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE MEGA LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶22

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶23

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant – claimant is present

¶24

through video conferencing/Physical Hearing. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present

¶25

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent - Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant – claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent -Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.1,40,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Forty Thousand only) in addition to what has been awarded by the Claims Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶26

The respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of

¶27

¶28

award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A.

¶29

from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶30

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant – claimant, on proper identification.

¶31

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the joint memo. The Judgment of the Tribunal shall stands modified accordingly. Draw up the award accordingly.

¶32

Sd/JUDGE

¶33

Sd/MEMBER

¶34

Rbv

Sri Venkatesha v. Sri Suresha D D

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Venkatesha v. Sri Suresha D D

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tukaram and Ors. Vs the Managing Director and Anr.

Sannaiah Vs Sourab Johri

Padmanabha Vs v. Ananthakrishnan

M/S Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Sri Bujjappa

Smt Gopamma Vs Sri Arun Kumar

Savithramma Vs the Manager