The driver's appeal against an award dismissing a compensation claim petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
M.F.A.NO.1827/2013 (MV)
BETWEEN:
APOORVA D/O NARASIMHAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O HAMAPPA SHE IS MINOR AND HENCE REP. BY HER GUARDIAN NARASIMHAMURTHY NGF, R/AT NO.12, ASWATHNAGAR BENGALURU-01
… APPELLANT
(BY SRI NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2-SERVED)
2
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 05.12.2012 PASSED IN MVC.NO.7848/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSE JUDGE & XVII ACMM, MACT, BENGALURU, DISMISING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this
Court to withdraw the appeal.
The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is placed on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
ST
Apoorva D/o Narasimhamurthy S/o Hamappa
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd.
Shashi Kumar S/o M. Krishnappa
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
