Disposed
Saganaiah v. the Special Land Acquisition Officer
Karnataka HCMFA/163/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 163 OF 2019
BETWEEN
SAGANAIAH S/O SAGANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O DHORANHOSAHALLI VILLAGE, KATTAYA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT ...Appellant
[By Sri CHETHAN B., Advocate]
AND
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER H.R.P-II, HASSAN HASSAN DISTRICT …Respondent
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/s 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, against the Judgment and Award dated: 26.03..2015 passed in L.A.C. No. 325/2014 on the file of the PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HASSAN, partly allowing the claim petition filed U/s 18(1) of Land Acquisition Act.
2
MFA. No.163/2019
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this
day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Four weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to Bench.
Registry is directed to secure the record of the Claims Tribunal. Instructions in this regard may be issued telephonically.
Sd/JUDGE
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt. 04.03.2021, Office objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
T By: MP
COPY R By: YS C By: JS Sd/I/C ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SAGANAIAH S/O SAGANAIAH
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER H.R.P-II, HASSAN
ALOK ARADHE
ASHOK S. KINAGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court