Smt Chandramma v. Nil
Case brief
What is this about?
The Karnataka High Court dismissed a Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 279 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, as the appellant was absent and the matter remained unprosecuted over a decade.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed.
What the court decided
M.F.A.No.12266/2011
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.12266/2011(ISA)
BETWEEN:
SMT. CHANDRAMMA W/O KALEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT HANUMANTHANAGARA BYRANAYAKANAHALLI HULIYURDURGA HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 101 …APPELLANT (BY SMT JAYALAKSHMI K B & SRI R CHANDRA KUMAR, ADVOCATES (ABSENT))
AND:
NIL
…RESPONDENT
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 279 OF INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.06.2011 PASSED BY I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, TUMKUR IN P & SC 93/2010.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 279 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, should be dismissed due to non-appearance and lack of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Chandramma W/o Kalegoda
- respondent
Nil
Coram
K.S. Mudagal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/12266/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court