Dismissed
Mr. Yogish v. Rajappa
Karnataka HCMFA/11725/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the motor vehicle accident appeal filed under Section 173(1) of the MV Act for non-prosecution, as the appellant failed to appear despite service of notice.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
¶3
BEFORE
¶4
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
¶5
MFA NO.11725 OF 2012 (MV)
¶6
BETWEEN :
¶7
MR. YOGISH S/O SADHU AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS KEB METER READER SATHIHALLI VILLAGE GULLENPET CHIKMAGALUR … APPELLANT
¶8
(BY SRI.YOGISH, APPELLANT [ABSENT])
¶9
AND :
¶10
- RAJAPPA S/O THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS DRIVER OF FERGUSON TRACTOR BEARING NO.MEC 5308 TROLLY MEC 5309 R/O G E THIPPAIAH PALYA COFFEE PLANTER GUDDAMANE ESTATE ALDUR POST, CHICKMAGALUR
¶11
- G.E.THIPPAIAH S/O G.E.EREGOWDA OWNER OF FERGUSON TRACTOR BEARING NO. MEC 5308 TROLLY MEC 5309
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Mr. Yogish S/o Sadhu
- respondent
Rajappa S/o Thimmaiah
- respondent
G.E. Thippaiah S/o G.E. Eregowda
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/11725/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court