The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act due to non-compliance with a peremptory order dated 28.01.2020.
None granted; appeal dismissed for non-compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.F.A.NO.1054/2019
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1054/2019(LAC)
BETWEEN:
M RUDRAGOWDA, S/O THIMMAPPA, AGE: MAJOR, R/AT HATTUR VILLAGE, HONNALI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT, REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER, V.NARAYANA, S/O VENKARACHALA, R/AT GADIKOPPA LAYOUT, WARD NO.35, SHIMOGA.
… APPELLANT
(BY SRI SANGAMESH G. PATIL, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
… RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT/DECREE PASSED IN REFERENCE LAC.NO.26/2010 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AT HARIHARA, DATED 12.12.2012 AND BE PLEASED TO DETERMINE THE MARKET
M.F.A.NO.1054/2019
2
VALUE OF THE APPELLANT LAND BEARING SY.NO.19 MEASURING 1 ACRE 18 GUNTAS OF HATTUR VILLAGE, HONNALI TALUK AT RS.64/- PER SQ.FEET AND AWARD ALL STATUTORY BENEFITS.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
No representation for the appellant. The
peremptory order dated 28.01.2020 is not complied.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
pgg
M Rudragowda Rep. by V. Narayana
The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer, U.T.P. Shimoga
The Executive Engineer, Neeravari Nigama Niyamitha
K.S. Mudagal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
